RetailLawBCLP

Pier 1 Settles Class Action Over Call-In Shifts for $3.5 Million

Pier 1 Settles Class Action Over Call-In Shifts for $3.5 Million

Dec 27, 2017
Download PDFDownload PDF
Print
Share

Pier 1 Import has agreed to pay $3.5 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of about 9,300 retail store associates in California.  The lawsuit alleged the company owed workers pay for when they are scheduled to call the store to ask if they should report for work or stay home.

California requires employers to provide “reporting time pay” to employees.  Employers must provide a few hours of pay when an employee reports to work for a scheduled shift but is dismissed a short time later because business is slow.

The complaint alleged that Pier 1 violated this law by requiring employees to call in one to two hours before the scheduled shift.  Employees complained that the call-in shifts were mandatory, and required employees to schedule their time around the possibility that they may work after a call-in shift.  Pier 1 Import has since discontinued the scheduling practice at issue, which it called a “Flex Shift” policy.

Judge Dale A. Drozd of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted preliminary approval of the settlement on December 12, 2017.  Class members will have an opportunity to object to the settlement or opt out before Judge Drozd decides whether to grant final approval.

For questions or additional information, contact the author, Traci Choi, at Traci.Choi@bryancave.com or 949-223-7169.

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

Meet The Team

This material is not comprehensive, is for informational purposes only, and is not legal advice. Your use or receipt of this material does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. If you require legal advice, you should consult an attorney regarding your particular circumstances. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This material may be “Attorney Advertising” under the ethics and professional rules of certain jurisdictions. For advertising purposes, St. Louis, Missouri, is designated BCLP’s principal office and Kathrine Dixon (kathrine.dixon@bclplaw.com) as the responsible attorney.